Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.groff.bug > #1712
| From | "G. Branden Robinson" <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | gnu.groff.bug |
| Subject | [bug #57592] [PATCH] tmac/<files containing a ".nx" request>: Add a warning |
| Date | 2020-02-04 02:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.257.1580803070.2412.bug-groff@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <20200115-034311.sv108747.17875@savannah.gnu.org> <20200116-060641.sv108747.66365@savannah.gnu.org> <20200116-060914.sv108747.36285@savannah.gnu.org> <20200116-062445.sv97361.89595@savannah.gnu.org> <20200204-075747.sv108747.36081@savannah.gnu.org> |
Follow-up Comment #7, bug #57592 (project groff):
[comment #5 comment #5:]
> And while I'm here I will add that doing the above would be irritating for
`an-old.tmac` at least, which pledges itself to classical troff compatibility
and therefore has matchbox-sized namespace.
Amusingly, my correction comment introduced an even bigger error than the one
I was fixing in the first place.
`an-old.tmac` is _not_ written in classical troff; it deploys many GNU roff
features and uses prodigiously long register names that for all I know cause
buffer overflows in Heirloom troff. Somewhere my brain knew this, because I
mentioned a couple of them in the groff_man(7) page.
It is `an-ext.tmac` that is written in the compatible dialect.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57592>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
Back to gnu.groff.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar
[bug #57592] [PATCH] tmac/<files containing a ".nx" request>: Add a warning "G. Branden Robinson" <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org> - 2020-02-04 02:57 -0500
csiph-web