Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #13777 > unrolled thread
| Started by | don fong <dfong@dfong.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-02-28 12:35 -0800 |
| Last post | 2018-02-28 12:35 -0800 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Unset array doesn't work don fong <dfong@dfong.com> - 2018-02-28 12:35 -0800
| From | don fong <dfong@dfong.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-02-28 12:35 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Unset array doesn't work |
| Message-ID | <mailman.9905.1519850123.27995.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
seems like it would be helpful to explain this behavior more clearly in the man page. On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:14 PM, Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> wrote: > On 2/28/18 3:00 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > Does unset create some kind of "placeholder" in the current function > > (but not in a caller)? > > Yes, that's what I said. In the current scope, unset arranges for the > variable to appear unset. In a previous scope, unset just removes the > variable, which uncovers an instance of the variable at a (further) > previous scope. > > It looks like I added that code in 1995. The code before that was "pure" > dynamic scoping, in the sense that it just removed the variable and > `uncovered' a previous scope's value no matter where the variable was > declared. It seems like I added the special case for several reasons, > but there's no indication of widespread user complaint about the behavior > of `unset'. (Of course, that was a long time ago.) > > -- > ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer > ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates > Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/ > >
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web