Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #16532 > unrolled thread

Re: Return from function depending on number of parameters

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Return from function depending on number of parameters Chris Elvidge <celvidge001@gmail.com> - 2020-07-04 12:01 +0100

#16532 — Re: Return from function depending on number of parameters

On 03/07/2020 10:39 pm, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>> On Jul 3, 2020, at 2:00 PM, Chris Elvidge <celvidge001@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> However 'N=0; echo $((!$N))' gives an error at the bash prompt.
>> 'echo $[!$N]' echo's 1 as expected.
>>
>> My question - is $[...] actually obsolete?
> 
> It might tell you something that $[...] is not even mentioned in
> the man page for bash 3.2.57, which is decidedly not the current
> version.
> 
>> If so, what should I use at the bash prompt to get the same effect?
> 
> 
> I expect that the error you encountered was caused by !$ expanding
> to the last word of the previous command and making the contents
> of $((...)) an invalid arithmetic expression. This didn't affect
> your scripts because history expansion is not enabled in non-interactive
> shells by default.
> 
> Try inserting a space.
> 
> 	$ N=0; printf %s\\n "$((! $N))"
> 	1
> 
> You can even drop the $.
> 
> 	$ N=0; printf %s\\n "$((! N))"
> 	1
> 
> vq
> 

Thanks for the info.
It also explains why I couldn't find a reference to $[...] except in the 
reference I quoted.


-- 

Chris Elvidge

5 Ebor Park, Appleton Roebuck, York.  YO23 7DZ.
Tel (Mob): +447443472958 mailto:celvidge@outlook.com

Calle Padre Raimundo Codesal 1, Vélez-Málaga, 29700, España

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug

csiph-web