Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15297 > unrolled thread

Re: Async processes started in functions not reliably started

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Async processes started in functions not reliably started Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen@sdaoden.eu> - 2019-08-05 15:49 +0200

#15297 — Re: Async processes started in functions not reliably started

Chet Ramey wrote in <e4abf389-e9f4-66eb-a6eb-ad3ea82f01c0@case.edu>:
 |On 8/5/19 8:05 AM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
 |
 |> Would be nice to have some shell support for signalling the parent
 |> that the child is now functional, a pipe(2) is much easier than
 |> going through temporary files, but of course not a bash bug.
 |
 |You could roll your own using a named pipe, but that's functionally no
 |different from using a temp file.

Thanks.

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug

csiph-web