Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15735 > unrolled thread
| Started by | L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-12-15 09:40 -0800 |
| Last post | 2019-12-15 09:40 -0800 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: unquoted expansion not working (was Re: Not missing, but very hard to see) L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> - 2019-12-15 09:40 -0800
| From | L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-12-15 09:40 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: unquoted expansion not working (was Re: Not missing, but very hard to see) |
| Message-ID | <mailman.895.1576431652.1979.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On 2019/12/14 15:12, Robert Elz wrote:
> From: L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org>
>
> | it could break existing scripts that
>
> Scripts _/should /_not be using brace expansion in the first place,
------
"Should" is about wishful thinking, not reality. What you or I
think "should" be done may be depressingly or surprisingly different
from what actually is done.
> it is useful to save typing for interactive shells,
----
I wouldn't know, since it doesn't take much for me to re-edit a line
and press 'v' to have it in an editor which I've found is usually the
prudent thing to do, since I can start a more comfortable editor and not
risk losing everything in the re-edit buff due to a misplaced quote among
other reasons.
The main reason is about what may be useful and the difficulty in
supporting a ton of small ranges accommodating the rest of Unicode's
alpha-numerics, or not having to worry about ranges so much as just
proper quoting for the, relative, handful of meta characters needing it.
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web