Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15413 > unrolled thread

Re: Wrong command option in the manual examples

Started byAndreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
First post2019-09-23 16:36 +0200
Last post2019-09-23 16:36 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Wrong command option in the manual examples Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> - 2019-09-23 16:36 +0200

#15413 — Re: Wrong command option in the manual examples

FromAndreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Date2019-09-23 16:36 +0200
SubjectRe: Wrong command option in the manual examples
Message-ID<mailman.881.1569249426.2190.bug-bash@gnu.org>
On Sep 23 2019, Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> wrote:

>     Date:        Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:29:18 +0300
>     From:        Ilkka Virta <itvirta@iki.fi>
>     Message-ID:  <59cf49b0-1292-b752-4fe8-8928fd558ebf@iki.fi>
>
>   | (as well the standard '-depth', somewhat confusingly)
>
> There is no real standard for this - NetBSD has deprecated the -depth
> operator (which never really was one) and replaced it by a -d option
> which makes much more sense (-depth never really was the right way to
> do it).

According to https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi, find -d already
appeared in 4.3BSD, and -depth is much newer.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug


csiph-web