Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15125 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-07-11 00:13 +0700 |
| Last post | 2019-07-11 00:13 +0700 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: alias problem -- conflict found Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> - 2019-07-11 00:13 +0700
| From | Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-11 00:13 +0700 |
| Subject | Re: alias problem -- conflict found |
| Message-ID | <mailman.856.1562778906.2688.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 09:01:28 -0700
From: L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org>
Message-ID: <5D260BD8.8010800@tlinx.org>
| What do you think aliases are?
I know exactly what aliases are. (I could just say "useless" but
that's a different kind of what they are than you mean.)
| They are both a simple hash substitution
substition yes, hash, maybe... I have no idea how Chet has chosen to
implement them, perhaps a hash table, perhaps a b-tree, perhaps a
simple linear list (sorted, or simply first (or last) first, or perhaps
maintained in use order fashion) - none of that matters to anything
as far as most of us are concerned.
| Aliases are store/implemented using hashes the same as stored paths
| are. They are effectively the same.
They might be implemented using similar techniques, but who cares? But
they aren't built, used, or removed, in anything like the same way, which
is what matters to users of them.
kre
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web