Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15117 > unrolled thread
| Started by | L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-07-10 06:48 -0700 |
| Last post | 2019-07-10 06:48 -0700 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: alias problem -- conflict found L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> - 2019-07-10 06:48 -0700
| From | L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-10 06:48 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: alias problem -- conflict found |
| Message-ID | <mailman.826.1562766596.2688.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On 2019/07/10 06:22, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 7/9/19 11:24 PM, L A Walsh wrote: > > >> ---- >> Why? What makes clarity "horrible". If someone didn't know shell's >> way of assigning different attributes to 'declare', vs. most languages >> having >> different keywords or variable notations would be more familiar. >> > > Clarity is fine, but it's an individual thing, and requires additional > context. If it makes things easier for you, great, but one of the things > you have to sacrifice is the ability for other people to help you figure > things out. > > If I submit something for other to look at, I usually have a key at the top: shopt -s expand_aliases alias my=declare int='my -i ' array='my -a ' map='my -A If they don't understand that, then I'd be skeptical of how much help I'd be sacrificing. Regardless, I use such things as a matter of health. The fewer repetitive characters I have to type, the better. I find that using a small subset like the above is within the capabilities of most shell programmers.
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web