Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #11337 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-12 23:09 -0600 |
| Last post | 2015-08-12 23:09 -0600 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: -e does not take effects in subshell Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> - 2015-08-12 23:09 -0600
| From | Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 23:09 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: -e does not take effects in subshell |
| Message-ID | <mailman.8234.1439442606.904.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 08/12/2015 09:54 PM, PRC wrote: > 1. If the function is complicated and contains lots of commands, it > would be more troublesome appending && to every command rather > than simply using one single "set -e" at the front. > 2. It is not > reasonable that suppression of '-e' is applied as well inside the > function. My intention is if my_build succeeds continue to do other > stuff. Does anyone like the rule that a function never fails only if it is part of a > compound command? Like it or not, it is the historical behavior standardized by POSIX. It is NOT intuitive, and our advice is "DON'T USE set -e - IT WON'T DO WHAT YOU WANT". We can't change the behavior, because it would break scripts that rely on the POSIX-specified behavior. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web