Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15726 > unrolled thread

Re: Not missing, but very hard to see (was Re: Backslash missing in brace expansion)

Started byChet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
First post2019-12-13 10:31 -0500
Last post2019-12-13 10:31 -0500
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Not missing, but very hard to see (was Re: Backslash missing in brace expansion) Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2019-12-13 10:31 -0500

#15726 — Re: Not missing, but very hard to see (was Re: Backslash missing in brace expansion)

FromChet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Date2019-12-13 10:31 -0500
SubjectRe: Not missing, but very hard to see (was Re: Backslash missing in brace expansion)
Message-ID<mailman.814.1576251089.1979.bug-bash@gnu.org>
On 12/12/19 9:57 PM, L A Walsh wrote:

>> The backquote is in [6], and the backslash disappears, you just get the 
>> pair of quotes in [2] because that's how printf %q outputs an empty string.
> -----
> 
>     I'm sorry, but you are mistaken.
> 
>     The characters from 'Z' (0x5A) through 'z' (0x61) are:
> 
> 0x5A 0x5B 0x5C 0x5D 0x5E 0x5F 0x60 0x61
> Z    [    \    ]     ^   _     `    a
> 
> the backslash comes between the two square brackets.

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2019-12/msg00017.html

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug


csiph-web