Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14178 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-30 16:59 +0200 |
| Last post | 2018-05-30 16:59 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Bash patches format Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2018-05-30 16:59 +0200
| From | Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-30 16:59 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Bash patches format |
| Message-ID | <mailman.810.1527692451.1292.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
Marty E. Plummer:
> Maintainers, I'd really like to hear your thoughts on this matter. If
> the diffs are produced as -p1 unified diffs, then downstreams who do
> convert from -p0 context won't have to, and distros who work around it
> won't either.
Speaking in my capacity as the OpenBSD packager for bash, either
way is fine. We use the upstream patches as provided ("distribution
patches"). These are applied with -p0 by default, but it's utterly
trivial to specify -p1 if necessary. The choice of context vs.
unified diffs is immaterial; patch(1) handles both formats.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web