Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15400 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-09-22 13:53 -0400 |
| Last post | 2019-09-22 13:53 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Incorrect example for `[[` command. Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2019-09-22 13:53 -0400
| From | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-22 13:53 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Incorrect example for `[[` command. |
| Message-ID | <mailman.798.1569174827.2190.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On 9/21/19 5:34 AM, Ilkka Virta wrote: > On 21.9. 03:12, hk wrote: >> Thanks for the reply. I was wrong in my report. It does match values like >> aab and aaaaaab in its original form. > > In some systems, yes. (It does that on my Debian, but doesn't work at all > on my Mac.) > >> It is syntatically correct as a regular expression. > > [[:space:]]*?(a)b isn't a well-defined POSIX ERE: > > 9.4.6 EREs Matching Multiple Characters > > The behavior of multiple adjacent duplication symbols ( '+', '*', '?', > and intervals) produces undefined results. It's ambiguous, but it can be interpreted as valid. I wonder why they used "undefined" instead of the usual "unspecified." -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web