Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14174 > unrolled thread

Re: Bash patches format

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Bash patches format Vladimir Marek <Vladimir.Marek@oracle.com> - 2018-05-30 13:09 +0200

#14174 — Re: Bash patches format

> > > > If people are willing to do the conversion between patch formats for
> > > their
> > > > own purposes, more power to them. I don't see any compelling reason to
> > > > change the format I use.
> > > >
> > > Could I at least convince you to start doing -p1, if not unified?
> > >
> > 
> > I think the cost is too high. All bash package maintainers on different
> > *nix systems will have to change accordingly.
> > 
> Well how about this; we ask the downstreams. List taken from repology,
> hopefully these are still all active and accurate. So, to reiterate the
> original premise of this thread for the newly added, I suggest the
> following:

Speaking for myself, as a bash maintainer in Solaris, I'm glad for
Chet's work in any shape or form. And I vote for anything which makes
his work easier.

The rest can be scripted

Thank you
-- 
	Vlad

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug

csiph-web