Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15725 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-12-12 22:03 -0500 |
| Last post | 2019-12-12 22:03 -0500 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Not missing, but very hard to see (was Re: Backslash missing in brace expansion) Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org> - 2019-12-12 22:03 -0500
| From | Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-12-12 22:03 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Not missing, but very hard to see (was Re: Backslash missing in brace expansion) |
| Message-ID | <mailman.767.1576206236.1979.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 12/12/19 9:57 PM, L A Walsh wrote:
>
>
> On 2019/12/12 13:01, Ilkka Virta wrote:
>> On 12.12. 21:43, L A Walsh wrote:
>>
>>> On 2019/12/06 14:14, Chet Ramey wrote:
>>>
>>> Seems very hard to print out that backquote though. Closest I got
>>> was bash converting it to "''":
>>>
>>
>> The backquote is in [6], and the backslash disappears, you just get
>> the pair of quotes in [2] because that's how printf %q outputs an
>> empty string.
>>
> -----
>
> I'm sorry, but you are mistaken.
How so?
> The characters from 'Z' (0x5A) through 'z' (0x61) are:
>
> 0x5A 0x5B 0x5C 0x5D 0x5E 0x5F 0x60 0x61
> Z [ \ ] ^ _ ` a
>
> the backslash comes between the two square brackets.
>
> Position [6] is the "Grave Accent" (or backquote).
>
> It is quoted properly.
But... that's exactly what was said.
> As for %q printing an empty string for 0x5C
>
> "%q" causes printf to output the corresponding argument in a
> format that can be reused as shell input.
>
> For that string to be empty would mean there is no character at hex
> value 0x5C (unicode U+005C), which isn't so.
But there isn't. An empty string was passed as an argument to printf,
because the backslash was *converted* via escaping, into an empty
string, *before* it was passed on the command line as an argv element to
the printf builtin.
Do you think that because printf is a builtin, and you didn't use
/bin/printf, that somehow means it is exempt from the usual rule of how
shells work, and gets to see its own argv before the parser reinterprets it?
>>
>>>> read -r -a a< <(printf "%q " {Z..a})
>>>> my -p a
>>>>
>>> declare -a a=([0]="Z" [1]="\\[" [2]="''" [3]="\\]" [4]="\\^" [5]="_"
>>> [6]="\\\`" [7]="a")
>>>
>>
>>
>>
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web