Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15455 > unrolled thread

Re: shouldn't it the comma operator has the lowerest precedence in the shell arithmetic expression?

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: shouldn't it the comma operator has the lowerest precedence in the shell arithmetic expression? Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2019-10-02 09:34 -0400

#15455 — Re: shouldn't it the comma operator has the lowerest precedence in the shell arithmetic expression?

On 10/1/19 8:35 PM, hk wrote:
> Configuration Information :
> Bash Version: 5.0
> Patch Level: 0
> Release Status: release
> 
> Description:
> the code snippet from expr.c starting from line 141:
> 
>> /* This should be the function corresponding to the operator with the
>>    highest precedence. */
>> #define EXP_HIGHEST expcomma
> 
> 
> Am I understanding it wrong or is it a typo?

The bash arithmetic parser does things in reverse order, in a way. So
the comma operator is the first thing you call, and it calls functions
that implement the other operators in ascending priority order. You
didn't misunderstand it.


-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug

csiph-web