Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15719 > unrolled thread

Re: Not missing, but very hard to see (was Re: Backslash missing in brace expansion)

Started byGreg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org>
First post2019-12-12 14:49 -0500
Last post2019-12-12 14:49 -0500
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Not missing, but very hard to see (was Re: Backslash missing in brace expansion) Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-12-12 14:49 -0500

#15719 — Re: Not missing, but very hard to see (was Re: Backslash missing in brace expansion)

FromGreg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org>
Date2019-12-12 14:49 -0500
SubjectRe: Not missing, but very hard to see (was Re: Backslash missing in brace expansion)
Message-ID<mailman.744.1576180223.1979.bug-bash@gnu.org>
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 11:43:58AM -0800, L A Walsh wrote:
> >  read -r -a a< <(printf "%q " {Z..a})
> >  my -p a
> declare -a a=([0]="Z" [1]="\\[" [2]="''" [3]="\\]" [4]="\\^" [5]="_"
> [6]="\\\`" [7]="a")

Nice try.  I guess the takeaway from this thread is: "You cannot mix
capital and lowercase letters in brace expansion.  If you try, you
get garbage out."

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug


csiph-web