Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15391 > unrolled thread

Re: [Patch] (tiny problem) bad short_doc for % command

Started byAndreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
First post2019-09-21 17:18 +0200
Last post2019-09-21 17:18 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [Patch] (tiny problem) bad short_doc for % command Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> - 2019-09-21 17:18 +0200

#15391 — Re: [Patch] (tiny problem) bad short_doc for % command

FromAndreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Date2019-09-21 17:18 +0200
SubjectRe: [Patch] (tiny problem) bad short_doc for % command
Message-ID<mailman.733.1569079134.2190.bug-bash@gnu.org>
On Sep 21 2019, "Christopher Chittleborough" <cchittleborough@cluemail.com> wrote:

> The command "help -s %" outputs
>         %: job_spec [&]
> when it should output
>         %: % job_spec [&]
> because the $SHORT_DOC for "%" in builtins/reserved.def is wrong.

A job spec already starts with %.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510  2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug


csiph-web