Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15449 > unrolled thread

Re: shouldn't it the comma operator has the lowerest precedence in the shell arithmetic expression?

Started byhk <hkadeveloper@gmail.com>
First post2019-10-02 08:59 +0800
Last post2019-10-02 08:59 +0800
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: shouldn't it the comma operator has the lowerest precedence in the shell arithmetic expression? hk <hkadeveloper@gmail.com> - 2019-10-02 08:59 +0800

#15449 — Re: shouldn't it the comma operator has the lowerest precedence in the shell arithmetic expression?

Fromhk <hkadeveloper@gmail.com>
Date2019-10-02 08:59 +0800
SubjectRe: shouldn't it the comma operator has the lowerest precedence in the shell arithmetic expression?
Message-ID<mailman.710.1569978016.2651.bug-bash@gnu.org>
sorry for the typo in the title, it should be *lowest*.

On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:35 AM hk <hkadeveloper@gmail.com> wrote:

> Configuration Information :
> Bash Version: 5.0
> Patch Level: 0
> Release Status: release
>
> Description:
> the code snippet from expr.c starting from line 141:
>
>> /* This should be the function corresponding to the operator with the
>>    highest precedence. */
>> #define EXP_HIGHEST expcomma
>
>
> Am I understanding it wrong or is it a typo?
>

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug


csiph-web