Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15449 > unrolled thread
| Started by | hk <hkadeveloper@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-10-02 08:59 +0800 |
| Last post | 2019-10-02 08:59 +0800 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: shouldn't it the comma operator has the lowerest precedence in the shell arithmetic expression? hk <hkadeveloper@gmail.com> - 2019-10-02 08:59 +0800
| From | hk <hkadeveloper@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-10-02 08:59 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: shouldn't it the comma operator has the lowerest precedence in the shell arithmetic expression? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.710.1569978016.2651.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
sorry for the typo in the title, it should be *lowest*. On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:35 AM hk <hkadeveloper@gmail.com> wrote: > Configuration Information : > Bash Version: 5.0 > Patch Level: 0 > Release Status: release > > Description: > the code snippet from expr.c starting from line 141: > >> /* This should be the function corresponding to the operator with the >> highest precedence. */ >> #define EXP_HIGHEST expcomma > > > Am I understanding it wrong or is it a typo? >
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web