Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15385 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ilkka Virta <itvirta@iki.fi> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-09-21 01:53 +0300 |
| Last post | 2019-09-21 01:53 +0300 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Incorrect example for `[[` command. Ilkka Virta <itvirta@iki.fi> - 2019-09-21 01:53 +0300
| From | Ilkka Virta <itvirta@iki.fi> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-21 01:53 +0300 |
| Subject | Re: Incorrect example for `[[` command. |
| Message-ID | <mailman.661.1569020030.2190.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On 20.9. 21:39, Chet Ramey wrote: > The portion of the manual before the example explains BASH_REMATCH and > BASH_REMATCH[0]. It also says "a sequence of characters in the value..." > when describing the pattern. Yeah, though the preceding paragraph contains both the general description of the regex match, and the mention of BASH_REMATCH, so the BASH_REMATCH angle could be a bit more explicit. So I'd probably say that the pattern would match e.g. 'xxx aabyyy', or 'xxxbyyy' and set $BASH_REMATCH to ' aab', or 'b', respectively. And then mention that the ^ and $ anchors could be used. I know the usual regex behavior is to find a match anywhere within the value, but since it's exactly the opposite of how regular pattern matches work, it's probably worth mentioning in some way. (Though I do think it's better to document things rather explicitly in general.) -- Ilkka Virta / itvirta@iki.fi
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web