Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15004 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-29 10:46 -0600 |
| Last post | 2018-12-29 10:46 -0600 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Error on arithmetic evaluation of `~0`. Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2018-12-29 10:46 -0600
| From | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-29 10:46 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Error on arithmetic evaluation of `~0`. |
| Message-ID | <mailman.6526.1546102281.1284.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On 12/28/18 11:26 PM, Bize Ma wrote:
> Chet Ramey (<chet.ramey@case.edu <mailto:chet.ramey@case.edu>>) wrote:
>
> On 12/23/18 12:01 PM, Bize Ma wrote:
>
> {…}
>
> > Both command line above should have printed "hello".
>
> No. 0 is the only valid subscript for a non-array variable. The difference
> between bash and other shells that implement this feature is that bash
> warns about negative subscripts.
>
>
> If you say so: fine for me.
>
> It still irks me a little that a `${var[-1]}` isn't the "last value"
> (sometimes!, consistency?).
The goal is not to make non-array variables look exactly like array
variables; the goal is to provide a little bit of syntactic sugar in
the rare case that it's useful. It's the analog to referencing an array
variable without using a subscript, which references element 0.
> I haven't seen that documented anywhere, though.
Which part? The fact that non-array variables can be referenced using
subscript 0?
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web