Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14993 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-28 18:23 -0600 |
| Last post | 2018-12-28 18:23 -0600 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported? Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2018-12-28 18:23 -0600
| From | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 18:23 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.6487.1546043048.1284.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On 12/27/18 11:32 PM, Peng Yu wrote: >> You're whacking moles. Use a profiler. That's what they're for. > > I've already shown that $() is a major problem to slow down the speed > and I have reduced using its usage in my code and significantly > improved the performance. This isn't a major deductive leap, since command substitution forks a child and reads through a pipe. Forking is always more expensive than not. -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web