Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14992 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-28 18:19 -0600 |
| Last post | 2018-12-28 18:19 -0600 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported? Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2018-12-28 18:19 -0600
| From | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 18:19 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.6485.1546043022.1284.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On 12/27/18 3:11 PM, Martijn Dekker wrote:
> Consistency might be a better argument. If [[ -v foo ]] is equivalent to [[
> -n ${foo+s} ]] for variables (with the advantage that you don't need 'eval'
> to handle arbitrary values of 'foo'), then perhaps it's not unreasonable to
> expect [[ -v 1 ]] to be equivalent to [[ -n ${1+s} ]].
The completeness argument is more rigorous, and there's a case to add this
in a future version of bash. He didn't make that argument, though.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web