Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14992 > unrolled thread

Re: Should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported?

Started byChet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
First post2018-12-28 18:19 -0600
Last post2018-12-28 18:19 -0600
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported? Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2018-12-28 18:19 -0600

#14992 — Re: Should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported?

FromChet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Date2018-12-28 18:19 -0600
SubjectRe: Should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported?
Message-ID<mailman.6485.1546043022.1284.bug-bash@gnu.org>
On 12/27/18 3:11 PM, Martijn Dekker wrote:

> Consistency might be a better argument. If [[ -v foo ]] is equivalent to [[
> -n ${foo+s} ]] for variables (with the advantage that you don't need 'eval'
> to handle arbitrary values of 'foo'), then perhaps it's not unreasonable to
> expect [[ -v 1 ]] to be equivalent to [[ -n ${1+s} ]].

The completeness argument is more rigorous, and there's a case to add this
in a future version of bash. He didn't make that argument, though.

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug


csiph-web