Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14967 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-27 13:22 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-12-27 13:22 -0500 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported? Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2018-12-27 13:22 -0500
| From | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 13:22 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.6403.1545934948.1284.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On 12/26/18 10:49 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
> Although [[ -z ${1+s} ]] and (($#)) works for testing if $1 is set,
> neither of them are uniformly better performance wise. In this case,
> should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported?
So you're saying that neither of the existing options performs better
than the other, though they both perform well, so we should add some
new capability just because? That's a particularly poor argument.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web