Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14967 > unrolled thread

Re: Should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported?

Started byChet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
First post2018-12-27 13:22 -0500
Last post2018-12-27 13:22 -0500
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported? Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2018-12-27 13:22 -0500

#14967 — Re: Should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported?

FromChet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Date2018-12-27 13:22 -0500
SubjectRe: Should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported?
Message-ID<mailman.6403.1545934948.1284.bug-bash@gnu.org>
On 12/26/18 10:49 PM, Peng Yu wrote:

> Although [[ -z ${1+s} ]]  and (($#)) works for testing if $1 is set,
> neither of them are uniformly better performance wise. In this case,
> should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported?

So you're saying that neither of the existing options performs better
than the other, though they both perform well, so we should add some
new capability just because? That's a particularly poor argument.


-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug


csiph-web