Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15711 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-12-10 11:31 -0500 |
| Last post | 2019-12-10 11:31 -0500 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] allow process substitution in POSIX mode Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2019-12-10 11:31 -0500
| From | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-12-10 11:31 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] allow process substitution in POSIX mode |
| Message-ID | <mailman.636.1575995525.1979.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On 12/8/19 4:29 AM, Oğuz wrote: > I think otherwise. In POSIX mode Bash should at least print warnings > about features POSIX lets implementations provide but doesn't mandate, > like function, select, [[, etc. This is not, and never has been, the purpose of bash's POSIX mode. If you want this, there are other shells and tools that provide it. -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web