Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14885 > unrolled thread

Re: $RANDOM not Cryptographically secure pseudorandom number generator

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: $RANDOM not Cryptographically secure pseudorandom number generator Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2018-12-03 10:03 -0500

#14885 — Re: $RANDOM not Cryptographically secure pseudorandom number generator

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 09:56:33AM -0500, Chet Ramey wrote:
> There has to be a compelling reason to change this, especially at a point
> so close to a major release.
> 
> You might be expecting too much from bash's random number generator. Is
> the problem that its period is at most 2**16? For its intended uses, the
> cycle length is acceptable. Do you disagree?

I suspect he doesn't share the same understanding of the "intended
uses" of bash's $RANDOM as the rest of us.

It's meant for displaying a random wallpaper image from a directory,
or for playing a random audio file from a directory.  Or for playing a
number guessing game with a 6 year old.

It is emphatically NOT for generating passwords.

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug

csiph-web