Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14455 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-08-06 15:14 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-08-06 15:14 -0500 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Rational Range Interpretation for bash-5.0? Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> - 2018-08-06 15:14 -0500
| From | Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-06 15:14 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Rational Range Interpretation for bash-5.0? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4770.1533586462.1292.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On 08/06/2018 03:07 PM, Chet Ramey wrote: > Hi. I am considering making bash glob expansion implement rational range > interpretation starting with bash-5.0 -- basically making globasciiranges > the default. It looks like glibc is going to do this for version 2.28 (at > least for a-z, A-Z, and 0-9), and other GNU utilities have done it for some > time. What do folks think? I'm in favor of the idea. -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web