Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14425 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Michal Pesa <pesathem@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-07-31 18:17 +0200 |
| Last post | 2019-02-03 13:17 -0800 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Lacking documentation of colored-completion-prefix Michal Pesa <pesathem@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 18:17 +0200
Re: Lacking documentation of colored-completion-prefix himat415@gmail.com - 2019-02-03 13:17 -0800
| From | Michal Pesa <pesathem@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-31 18:17 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Lacking documentation of colored-completion-prefix |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4475.1533053858.1292.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
That's exactly what I would welcome in the manual. Something as simple as: The socket color "so" of the LS_COLORS variable is used as the prefix color. Regards. On 7/31/2018 5:09 PM, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 7/25/18 2:48 PM, Michal Pesa wrote: >> It would be obvious then what color exactly needs to be change in the >> LS_COLORS variable if a different color was desired. > I don't see setting the color in stone as helping the user experience. > It's the same color as sockets right now, since that's unlikely to be > encountered during normal filename completion, but that could change.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | himat415@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-03 13:17 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2963e2ff-749f-4c9a-95c1-f612195492f7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #14425 |
I agree, I had to find this thread just to figure this out in order to change my prefix highlighting color. On Tuesday, July 31, 2018 at 12:17:39 PM UTC-4, Michal Pesa wrote: > That's exactly what I would welcome in the manual. Something as simple > as: The socket color "so" of the LS_COLORS variable is used as the > prefix color. > > Regards. > > > On 7/31/2018 5:09 PM, Chet Ramey wrote: > > On 7/25/18 2:48 PM, Michal Pesa wrote: > >> It would be obvious then what color exactly needs to be change in the > >> LS_COLORS variable if a different color was desired. > > I don't see setting the color in stone as helping the user experience. > > It's the same color as sockets right now, since that's unlikely to be > > encountered during normal filename completion, but that could change.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web