Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15288 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-07-31 21:35 -0400 |
| Last post | 2019-07-31 21:35 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: memleak in execute_function? Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2019-07-31 21:35 -0400
| From | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-31 21:35 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: memleak in execute_function? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.402.1564623346.1985.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On 7/31/19 8:57 PM, fireshen wrote: > Yeah, I agree with your opinion, in the branch "if (subshell == 0) ", we have > the function "maybe_restore_getopt_state" to free gs; however, in the branch > "else", it seems like forget to free "gs", or we don't have to free it? We don't have to free it. If subshell != 0 we are called from a function that executes a function in a subshell environment, and all it does is call exit(). -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web