Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #11659 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-15 10:28 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-10-15 10:28 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Running procs in bg, +Ctl-C, then Ctl-C again after they complete + NL==? Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2015-10-15 10:28 -0400
| From | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-15 10:28 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Running procs in bg, +Ctl-C, then Ctl-C again after they complete + NL==? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.381.1444919378.7904.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On 10/15/15 1:05 AM, Linda Walsh wrote: > Was just playing around seeing how the sigint > being ignored in children acted. wrote short > function: This behavior seems limited to testing > this as a foregnd function, not a shell script. > I.e, sourcing the function, then > execute the function: Thanks, you've discovered an unrelated problem. This was first reported back in July, and is fixed in the devel branch and bash-4.4-beta. Chet -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web