Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14340 > unrolled thread

Re: Issue – Invalid command documented – BASH_BUILTINS(1) –

Started byChet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
First post2018-07-14 11:46 -0400
Last post2018-07-14 11:46 -0400
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Issue – Invalid command documented – BASH_BUILTINS(1) – Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2018-07-14 11:46 -0400

#14340 — Re: Issue – Invalid command documented – BASH_BUILTINS(1) –

FromChet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Date2018-07-14 11:46 -0400
SubjectRe: Issue – Invalid command documented – BASH_BUILTINS(1) –
Message-ID<mailman.3577.1531583305.1292.bug-bash@gnu.org>
On 7/14/18 10:38 AM, Ricky Tigg wrote:
> OS: Fedora; Component: bash.x86_64 4.4.23-1.fc28 @updates
> 
> Description: Non-valid documented command 'BASH_BUILTINS(1)'.

This is an issue to take up with Fedora. But doesn't this show that the
`command' isn't `documented':

> $ man 1 bash_builtins
> No manual entry for bash_builtins in section 1
> $ man bash_builtins
> No manual entry for bash_builtins


> $ man alias
> BASH_BUILTINS(1)                                         General Commands
> Manual                                        BASH_BUILTINS(1)
> 
> NAME
>        bash, :, ., [, alias, (...), wait - bash built-in commands, see
> bash(1)

So this shows that there is a catch-all page that documents all the bash
builtin commands.

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug


csiph-web