Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14325 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Isaac Marcos <isaacmarcos100010@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-07-10 20:44 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-07-10 20:44 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Number with sign is read as octal despite a leading 10# Isaac Marcos <isaacmarcos100010@gmail.com> - 2018-07-10 20:44 -0400
| From | Isaac Marcos <isaacmarcos100010@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-10 20:44 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Number with sign is read as octal despite a leading 10# |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3405.1531269896.1292.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
According to Chet, the definition > is the same as the ISO C standard. I'm not sure if there's a public > version of the ISO C standard document, but > http://c0x.coding-guidelines.com/6.4.4.1.html seems to be good enough. > The definition of an "integer constant" in that document does not > include a sign. > > That is a description of the inability (or unwillingness) to raise above c limitations. Let me state that even better. That's like saying that because the only tool known is a hammer, then, using an screw is not possible with a hammer and therefore it is a bad idea to invent one. Just silly. > I'll just use some other shell. > > -- Cases are always threesome: Best case, Worst case, and Just in case
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web