Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15344 > unrolled thread

Re: Idea: *.p<TAB> completion

Started byChet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
First post2019-09-01 14:42 -0400
Last post2019-09-01 14:42 -0400
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Idea: *.p<TAB> completion Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2019-09-01 14:42 -0400

#15344 — Re: Idea: *.p<TAB> completion

FromChet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Date2019-09-01 14:42 -0400
SubjectRe: Idea: *.p<TAB> completion
Message-ID<mailman.283.1567363383.2075.bug-bash@gnu.org>
On 9/1/19 2:35 PM, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> CR> I'm saying that's what the default bash completion code does. The default
> CR> bash completion code leaves the word unchanged.
> 
> Yes. That's why I'm saying wouldn't it be neat if it made
> *.p into *.pdf? What harm could possibly happen?

I don't see that as being particularly worth the implementation cost and
the false positives.

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug


csiph-web