Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #11583 > unrolled thread

Re: readline and bash disagree on $'' quoting

Started byChet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
First post2015-10-06 14:56 -0400
Last post2015-10-06 14:56 -0400
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: readline and bash disagree on $'' quoting Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2015-10-06 14:56 -0400

#11583 — Re: readline and bash disagree on $'' quoting

FromChet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Date2015-10-06 14:56 -0400
SubjectRe: readline and bash disagree on $'' quoting
Message-ID<mailman.25.1444157835.916.bug-bash@gnu.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/5/15 3:52 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> Consider this command:
> 
>   foo $'foo \' bar'
> 
> As far as the bash core is concerned, this command has one argument
> word. But readline, for completion, splits it up into three words:
> 
>   0: foo
>   1: $'abc \'
>   2: bar'
> 
> Shouldn't we be splitting the command line into the same number of words?

Yes, we should, at least for programmable completion.  I found the spot
that needed to be changed, and it will be fixed for the next version.

Chet
- -- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iEYEARECAAYFAlYUGWoACgkQu1hp8GTqdKtBGwCfQVTXfFtMmMLrgttFzW2mZn9Z
TAUAn0QBJrFRtUJbgbwxXl8KH0Xgfis+
=WkeI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug


csiph-web