Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15800 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-01-13 09:11 -0500 |
| Last post | 2020-01-13 09:11 -0500 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Filename Expansion bug Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2020-01-13 09:11 -0500
| From | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-01-13 09:11 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Filename Expansion bug |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2484.1578924719.1979.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On 1/9/20 6:09 AM, Mickael KENIKSSI wrote: > Thanks for your comment. > > I understand this may not sound of primary importance for you since they > are canonically equivalent, but sometimes what we really all care about is > the path as a literal string (be it well- or ill-formed), and not the > filesystem object it points to. Pathname expansion deals with that filesystem object, and those filesystem objects have a single slash as the directory separator. That's how the bash implementation deals with it. > I suppose it all comes down to an implementation question. Indeed, it does. -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web