Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15278 > unrolled thread
| Started by | L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-07-30 00:55 -0700 |
| Last post | 2019-07-30 00:55 -0700 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: valid kernel patch? using -e to catch errors? L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> - 2019-07-30 00:55 -0700
| From | L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-30 00:55 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: valid kernel patch? using -e to catch errors? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.240.1564473338.1985.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On 2019/07/29 22:49, kre@munnari.OZ.AU wrote:
> | I didn't see this come back from the list and it was sent
> | 45 minutes ago (vs. other emails of mine that have come
> | back in under a minute).
> | Did anyone else see it?
>
> Yes. The original appeared (before this repeat). Avoid
> being impatient, all kinds of things can delay e-mail (a once
> an hour retry is not uncommon - so 45 mins is certainly not
> long enough to wait before becoming concerned - allow at least
> a day).
>
---
Atypical behavior is cause for concern. The list received the posting,
but FYI, I still haven't received either post.
> | FWIW, the below is from the publicly posted change notes
> | for the 5.2.3 patch.
>
> I have no idea what patch you're talking about, as it has
> nothing to do with any system I run.
>
Then why not ignore it? Why respond to it? You've given it more response
feedback than anyone. It's from the kernel patch notes and is
from a patch that went into the linux kernel.
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web