Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15278 > unrolled thread

Re: valid kernel patch? using -e to catch errors?

Started byL A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org>
First post2019-07-30 00:55 -0700
Last post2019-07-30 00:55 -0700
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: valid kernel patch? using -e to catch errors? L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> - 2019-07-30 00:55 -0700

#15278 — Re: valid kernel patch? using -e to catch errors?

FromL A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org>
Date2019-07-30 00:55 -0700
SubjectRe: valid kernel patch? using -e to catch errors?
Message-ID<mailman.240.1564473338.1985.bug-bash@gnu.org>

On 2019/07/29 22:49, kre@munnari.OZ.AU wrote:
>   | I didn't see this come back from the list and it was sent
>   | 45 minutes ago (vs. other emails of mine that have come
>   | back in under a minute).
>   | Did anyone else see it?
>
> Yes.   The original appeared (before this repeat).   Avoid
> being impatient, all kinds of things can delay e-mail (a once
> an hour retry is not uncommon - so 45 mins is certainly not
> long enough to wait before becoming concerned - allow at least
> a day).
>   
---
    Atypical behavior is cause for concern.  The list received the posting,
but FYI, I still haven't received either post.
>   | FWIW, the below is from the publicly posted change notes
>   | for the 5.2.3 patch.
>
> I have no idea what patch you're talking about, as it has
> nothing to do with any system I run. 
>   
Then why not ignore it?  Why respond to it?  You've given it more response
feedback than anyone.  It's from the kernel patch notes and is
from a patch that went into the linux kernel.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug


csiph-web