Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14257 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Martijn Dekker <martijn@inlv.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-06-20 19:09 +0100 |
| Last post | 2018-06-20 19:09 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: $OPTIND varibale value is different from sh Martijn Dekker <martijn@inlv.org> - 2018-06-20 19:09 +0100
| From | Martijn Dekker <martijn@inlv.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-20 19:09 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: $OPTIND varibale value is different from sh |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2309.1529518159.1292.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
Op 20-06-18 om 13:39 schreef Greg Wooledge: > I really don't understand what you're doing here, either. The only > use of OPTIND is after the final call to getopts, when there are no > more options to process. At that point, OPTIND tells you how many > times you have to "shift" to get rid of all the options that were > processed. (And you have to subtract 1, because legacy historical > reasons.) In other words, because all the options have now been processed, OPTIND points to the first argument *after* the list of options. I don't see how that is "because legacy historical reasons". It seems both logical and useful to me. > Any attempt to use OPTIND in the middle of the loop seems pointless > and hazardous to me. Agreed. - M.
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web