Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15216 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-07-23 11:52 -0400 |
| Last post | 2019-07-23 11:52 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: leaks fd for internal functions but not external command Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-07-23 11:52 -0400
| From | Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-23 11:52 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: leaks fd for internal functions but not external command |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2086.1563897210.2688.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 04:40:03PM +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote:
> Is using {xxx}>... suppose to give me a file handle I can use as I wish (as
> you say), or not?
>
> Using explicit descriptors e.g. 10>... behaves consistently whether the the
> command is internal or external.
>
> Having bash allocate the descriptor is not consistent.
>
> Sam
I'm getting major deja vu here.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2012-11/msg00082.html
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web