Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15216 > unrolled thread

Re: leaks fd for internal functions but not external command

Started byGreg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org>
First post2019-07-23 11:52 -0400
Last post2019-07-23 11:52 -0400
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: leaks fd for internal functions but not external command Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-07-23 11:52 -0400

#15216 — Re: leaks fd for internal functions but not external command

FromGreg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org>
Date2019-07-23 11:52 -0400
SubjectRe: leaks fd for internal functions but not external command
Message-ID<mailman.2086.1563897210.2688.bug-bash@gnu.org>
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 04:40:03PM +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote:
> Is using {xxx}>... suppose to give me a file handle I can use as I wish (as
> you say), or not?
> 
> Using explicit descriptors e.g. 10>... behaves consistently whether the the
> command is internal or external.
> 
> Having bash allocate the descriptor is not consistent.
> 
> Sam

I'm getting major deja vu here.

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2012-11/msg00082.html

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug


csiph-web