Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15606 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-11-18 11:22 -0500 |
| Last post | 2019-11-18 11:22 -0500 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Issues with history substitution and its documentation Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2019-11-18 11:22 -0500
| From | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-18 11:22 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Issues with history substitution and its documentation |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1864.1574094149.13325.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On 11/6/19 8:04 AM, Jim Monte wrote: > Regarding the & word modifier, it would be useful to note in the > documentation that it applies the previous substitution whether it had been > successful or not, as shown below. I don't think there's a need to qualify "previous substitution" here. -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web