Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15181 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-07-16 15:47 -0400 |
| Last post | 2019-07-16 15:47 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: backquote peculiarities Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2019-07-16 15:47 -0400
| From | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-16 15:47 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: backquote peculiarities |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1520.1563306463.2688.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On 7/16/19 3:03 PM, astian wrote: > Ah, thanks for the clarification. I wonder if the excerpt below (particularly > the last sentence) would be the relevant wording of POSIX, i.e. that some > shells might interpret the command as the concatenation of a double-quoted > string, the unquoted $i, and another double-quoted string: That's the historical Bourne shell behavior, and I'm pretty sure that ksh-88, at least, preserves it. -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web