Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15181 > unrolled thread

Re: backquote peculiarities

Started byChet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
First post2019-07-16 15:47 -0400
Last post2019-07-16 15:47 -0400
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: backquote peculiarities Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2019-07-16 15:47 -0400

#15181 — Re: backquote peculiarities

FromChet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Date2019-07-16 15:47 -0400
SubjectRe: backquote peculiarities
Message-ID<mailman.1520.1563306463.2688.bug-bash@gnu.org>
On 7/16/19 3:03 PM, astian wrote:

> Ah, thanks for the clarification.  I wonder if the excerpt below (particularly
> the last sentence) would be the relevant wording of POSIX, i.e. that some
> shells might interpret the command as the concatenation of a double-quoted
> string, the unquoted $i, and another double-quoted string:

That's the historical Bourne shell behavior, and I'm pretty sure that
ksh-88, at least, preserves it.

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug


csiph-web