Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14222 > unrolled thread

Re: program gets faster when it outputs more on stderr

Started byMike Jonkmans <bashbug@jonkmans.nl>
First post2018-06-07 09:24 +0200
Last post2018-06-07 09:24 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: program gets faster when it outputs more on stderr Mike Jonkmans <bashbug@jonkmans.nl> - 2018-06-07 09:24 +0200

#14222 — Re: program gets faster when it outputs more on stderr

FromMike Jonkmans <bashbug@jonkmans.nl>
Date2018-06-07 09:24 +0200
SubjectRe: program gets faster when it outputs more on stderr
Message-ID<mailman.1391.1528356310.1292.bug-bash@gnu.org>
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 04:50:22PM -0500, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 3/10/18 9:46 AM, bashbug@jonkmans.nl wrote:
> 
> > Bash Version: 4.4
> > Patch Level: 12
> > Release Status: release
> > 
> > Description:
> > 	When a function is ran in a subshell environment (via backticks),
> > 	the program runs faster when that function also writes to stderr.
> 
> I don't get these results. I ran it a few times out of curiosity, and the
> `fast' version ran 2-3 times slower than the `slow' one. Even running it
> against a profiling version doesn't show any significant difference in
> function calls.
> 
> Your results could be due to many factors: stdio buffering, a scheduler
> that biases perceived interactive processes, I/O optimizations. Nothing
> to do with bash, though.
> 

When i run the script with realtime prio (as root) via : chrt -r 99 <script>
the timings are as expected; more output takes longer.

So it is likely the scheduler at work here.

I have rewritten my original script with namerefs to pass the result out of
the function. This saves a lot of fork/clone calls.
It seems to be fast enough to stay in the interactive scheduler regime.

Regards, Mike


PS Chet, i had already sent you this some time ago.
But accidentally not to the mailinglist.

--
Mike <bashbug@jonkmans.nl>

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug


csiph-web