Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15164 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-07-14 13:57 -0400 |
| Last post | 2019-07-14 13:57 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: built-in printf %f parameter format depend on LC_NUMERIC Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2019-07-14 13:57 -0400
| From | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-14 13:57 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: built-in printf %f parameter format depend on LC_NUMERIC |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1305.1563127037.2688.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On 7/12/19 5:19 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Jul 12 2019, Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> wrote: > >> I assume this means that bc doesn't use strtod. > > Of course not, strtod doesn't parse arbitrary precision numbers. Yes, exactly. -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web