Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14220 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-06-05 07:50 +0530 |
| Last post | 2018-06-05 07:50 +0530 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Clarify cases of implicit and explicit line continuation Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 07:50 +0530
| From | Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 07:50 +0530 |
| Subject | Re: Clarify cases of implicit and explicit line continuation |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1159.1528165272.1292.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 6:18 PM, Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> wrote: > The general rule is simple: bash reads input a line at a time, feeding > each line to the parser, until it has enough input for a complete > command. If it doesn't have enough to complete a command, it will read > additional lines. If a newline would complete a command, you need to > quote it to prevent it being interpreted as such. Yes that is all understood. All I'm requesting for is for this behaviour to be *documented* in the manpage. -- Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा 𑀰𑁆𑀭𑀻𑀭𑀫𑀡𑀰𑀭𑁆𑀫𑀸
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web