Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14220 > unrolled thread

Re: Clarify cases of implicit and explicit line continuation

Started byShriramana Sharma <samjnaa@gmail.com>
First post2018-06-05 07:50 +0530
Last post2018-06-05 07:50 +0530
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Clarify cases of implicit and explicit line continuation Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 07:50 +0530

#14220 — Re: Clarify cases of implicit and explicit line continuation

FromShriramana Sharma <samjnaa@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-05 07:50 +0530
SubjectRe: Clarify cases of implicit and explicit line continuation
Message-ID<mailman.1159.1528165272.1292.bug-bash@gnu.org>
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 6:18 PM, Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> wrote:
> The general rule is simple: bash reads input a line at a time, feeding
> each line to the parser, until it has enough input for a complete
> command. If it doesn't have enough to complete a command, it will read
> additional lines. If a newline would complete a command, you need to
> quote it to prevent it being interpreted as such.

Yes that is all understood. All I'm requesting for is for this
behaviour to be *documented* in the manpage.

-- 
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा 𑀰𑁆𑀭𑀻𑀭𑀫𑀡𑀰𑀭𑁆𑀫𑀸

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug


csiph-web