Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15584 > unrolled thread

Re: bug in arithmetic expansion

Started bypepa65 <solusos@passchier.net>
First post2019-11-09 22:12 +0700
Last post2019-11-09 22:12 +0700
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: bug in arithmetic expansion pepa65 <solusos@passchier.net> - 2019-11-09 22:12 +0700

#15584 — Re: bug in arithmetic expansion

Frompepa65 <solusos@passchier.net>
Date2019-11-09 22:12 +0700
SubjectRe: bug in arithmetic expansion
Message-ID<mailman.1112.1573312389.13325.bug-bash@gnu.org>
In the arithmetic context, leading zeroes signify an octal base. Had you
used an 8 or 9, you would have gotten a message like:

bash: 08: value too great for base (error token is "08")

when trying: echo $((08))

So it's not a bug, it's a feature; make sure your base-10 numbers don't
have leading zeroes!

Peter


On 11/9/19 5:52 PM, Joern Knoll wrote:
> Hallo,
> 
> in playing around with digital keys (integers) which have a simple
> arithmetic check property, I encountered problemsusing bash's arithmetic
> expansion, when ever the used digital substrings have leading zeros. The
> problem shows up already for the simplest operations, namely converting
> a string argument to its numerical value, as shown below.
> 
> With thanks for your attention and best regards, Jörn Knoll
> 
> [tplx99]:/the/knoll > echo $((0123))
> 83
> [tplx99]:/the/knoll > echo $((123))
> 123
> [tplx99]:/the/knoll > echo $((01234))
> 668
> [tplx99]:/the/knoll > echo $((1234))
> 1234
> 
> 

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug


csiph-web