Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14626 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Enrique Soriano <esoriano@gsyc.urjc.es> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-21 18:05 +0200 |
| Last post | 2018-09-21 18:05 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Special parameter ? Enrique Soriano <esoriano@gsyc.urjc.es> - 2018-09-21 18:05 +0200
| From | Enrique Soriano <esoriano@gsyc.urjc.es> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 18:05 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Special parameter ? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1099.1537545968.1284.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
> The thing that creates the background job IS a foreground pipeline. It's a foreground pipeline that creates a background > job, if that makes sense. Sure. That's the mechanism to implement the background job. The problem is that the user that reads the manual is dealing with the "background" and "foreground" abstractions; for him, the most recently foreground command in my example is false. > I recommend to store the value of $? in a variable if you plan on using it afterwards, since it's extremely easy to end > up overriding its value. Thanks, but I am not trying to implement anything. I am trying to fix the man page :) > You're right, but it might be less confusing if I removed the "foreground" > from the description. This could help. -- Enrique Soriano Escuela Superior de Ingeniería de Telecomunicación, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. Tel: 914888762 http://gsyc.urjc.es/~esoriano
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web