Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #13749

Re: Function definitions

From Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: Function definitions
Date 2018-02-26 09:20 -0500
Message-ID <mailman.9751.1519654865.27995.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <877er0qbb7.fsf@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2/26/18 5:45 AM, moosotc@gmail.com wrote:

> Bash Version: 4.4
> Patch Level: 19
> Release Status: release
> 
> Description:
>         Bash rejects valid function definitions
> 
> Repeat-By:
> 
> $ func() true
> bash: syntax error near unexpected token `true'

Yes, bash requires that function bodies be compound commands, as the Posix
grammar specifies.

> # Variant#2
> $ func() { true }
>> ^C

This is not a valid compound command. To be recognized as a reserved word,
and end the group command, the close brace must appear in a context where
a reserved word is valid. The argument to a simple command is not such a
place.

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Function definitions Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2018-02-26 09:20 -0500

csiph-web