Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15472
| From | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: Bug? `set -e` inside functions inside `$(...)` |
| Date | 2019-10-04 08:01 -0400 |
| Organization | ITS, Case Western Reserve University |
| Message-ID | <mailman.955.1570190548.2651.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <CADO30sqtGh+O54c0pLic-8YA00VG244gcRY8x8XFv8yHNby5yA@mail.gmail.com> <CADO30spotrQHiTWfKFngTPERSypRz3PgJRh+UA1EKv_D=qGiBQ@mail.gmail.com> <f1ab5ff1-db02-1037-600b-3827aba94179@case.edu> |
On 10/3/19 8:58 PM, John W wrote: > Ah, got it sorted out. > > Not a bug, of course (: > > Bash, when not in posix mode, clears the '-e' flag in subshell environments. You might be interested in the `inherit_errexit' option. -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Bug? `set -e` inside functions inside `$(...)` Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2019-10-04 08:01 -0400
csiph-web