Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14197

Re: Clarify cases of implicit and explicit line continuation

Path csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: Clarify cases of implicit and explicit line continuation
Date Fri, 1 Jun 2018 08:48:36 -0400
Lines 20
Approved bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID <mailman.930.1527857327.1292.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <CAH-HCWWkjs-tzA19zbFto00ptfvV4tGB+Ks3SzyxPhYpnOgWhA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To chet.ramey@case.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1527857327 12402 208.118.235.17 (1 Jun 2018 12:48:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
Cc chet.ramey@case.edu
To Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@gmail.com>, bug-bash@gnu.org
Envelope-to bug-bash@gnu.org
Openpgp preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt addr=chet.ramey@case.edu; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsDiBEEOsGwRBACFa0A1oa71HSZLWxAx0svXzhOZNQZOzqHmSuGOG92jIpQpr8DpvgRh40Yp AwdcXb8QG1J5yGAKeevNE1zCFaA725vGSdHUyypHouV0xoWwukYO6qlyyX+2BZU+okBUqoWQ koWxiYaCSfzB2Ln7pmdys1fJhcgBKf3VjWCjd2XJTwCgoFJOwyBFJdugjfwjSoRSwDOIMf0D /iQKqlWhIO1LGpMrGX0il0/x4zj0NAcSwAk7LaPZbN4UPjn5pqGEHBlf1+xDDQCkAoZ/VqES GZragl4VqJfxBr29Ag0UDvNbUbXoxQsARdero1M8GiAIRc50hj7HXFoERwenbNDJL86GPLAQ OTGOCa4W2o29nFfFjQrsrrYHzVtyA/9oyKvTeEMJ7NA3VJdWcmn7gOu0FxEmSNhSoV1T4vP2 1Wf7f5niCCRKQLNyUy0wEApQi4tSysdz+AbgAc0b/bHYVzIf2uO2lIEZQNNt+3g2bmXgloWm W5fsm/di50Gm1l1Na63d3RZ00SeFQos6WEwLUHEB0yp6KXluXLLIZitEJM0gQ2hldCBSYW1l eSA8Y2hldC5yYW1leUBjYXNlLmVkdT7CYQQTEQIAIQIbAwYLCQgHAwIDFQIDAxYCAQIeAQIX gAUCRX3FIgIZAQAKCRC7WGnwZOp0q069AKCNDRn+zzN/AHbaynls/Lvq1kH/RQCgkLvF8bDs maUHSxSIPqzlGuKWDxbOwE0EQQ6wbxAEAJCukwDigRDPhAuI+lf+6P64lWanIFOXIndqhvU1 3cDbQ/Wt5LwPzm2QTvd7F+fcHOgZ8KOFScbDpjJaRqwIybMTcIN0B2pBLX/C10W1aY+cUrXZ gXUGVISEMmpaP9v02auToo7XXVEHC+XLO9IU7/xaU98FL69l6/K4xeNSBRM/AAMHA/wNAmRB pcyK0+VggZ5esQaIP/LyolAm2qwcmrd3dZi+g24s7yjV0EUwvRP7xHRDQFgkAo6++QbuecU/ J90lxrVnQwucZmfz9zgWDkT/MpfB/CNRSKLFjhYq2yHmHWT6vEjw9Ry/hF6Pc0oh1a62USdf aKAiim0nVxxQmPmiRvtCmcJJBBgRAgAJBQJBDrBvAhsMAAoJELtYafBk6nSr43AAn2ZZFQg8 Gs/zUzvXMt7evaFqVTzcAJ0cHtKpP1i/4H4R9+OsYeQdxxWxTQ==
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
In-Reply-To <CAH-HCWWkjs-tzA19zbFto00ptfvV4tGB+Ks3SzyxPhYpnOgWhA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language en-US
X-Junkmail-Status score=7/90, host=mpv1-2015.case.edu
X-Junkmail-PrAS-Raw score=7/90, refid=2.7.2:2018.6.1.122117:17:7.944, ip=, rules=__HAS_REPLYTO, __HAS_CC_HDR, __SUBJ_REPLY, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NAME, __TO_NAME_DIFF_FROM_ACC, __REFERENCES, __HAS_FROM, FROM_EDU_TLD, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, DATE_TZ_NA, __USER_AGENT, __MOZILLA_USER_AGENT, __MIME_VERSION, __IN_REP_TO, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_ADDY, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_ACC, __FROM_DOMAIN_IN_ANY_CC1, __FROM_DOMAIN_IN_ANY_CC2, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_DOMAIN, __ANY_URI, __HTTPS_URI, __URI_WITH_PATH, __URI_NO_WWW, __CP_URI_IN_BODY, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __MULTIPLE_URI_TEXT, __URI_IN_BODY, __URI_NOT_IMG, __FORWARDED_MSG, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_1000_1099, __MIME_TEXT_P1, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, __URI_NS, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, IN_REP_TO, MSG_THREAD, __FROM_DOMAIN_IN_RCPT, __TO_REAL_NAMES, MULTIPLE_REAL_RCPTS, [TRUNCATED], so=2010-03-03 19:42:08, dmn=2016-08-03-0138
X-detected-operating-system by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] [fuzzy]
X-Received-From 129.22.103.226
X-BeenThere bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.21
Precedence list
List-Id Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/>
List-Post <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:14197

Show key headers only | View raw


On 6/1/18 1:28 AM, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
> Hello. See https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/253518/where-are-bash-line-continuations-after-and-documented.
> 
> Roughly put, wherever lines terminating with a particular token are
> syntactically valid, they are taken as complete, and an explicit \ is
> required to continue the line, but lines ending with && || or I and
> lines where an array definition has been started with =( but not
> closed with a ) implicitly continue to the next physical line. 

The general rule is simple: bash reads input a line at a time, feeding
each line to the parser, until it has enough input for a complete
command. If it doesn't have enough to complete a command, it will read
additional lines. If a newline would complete a command, you need to
quote it to prevent it being interpreted as such.

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Clarify cases of implicit and explicit line continuation Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2018-06-01 08:48 -0400

csiph-web