Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #11395

Re: remaking bash, trying static, glibc refuses static...?

From Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: remaking bash, trying static, glibc refuses static...?
Date 2015-08-19 10:58 -0400
Message-ID <mailman.8632.1439996305.904.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <55D106B2.9000705@tlinx.org> <20150817044932.GB1584@vapier> <55D396EF.8030102@tlinx.org> <20150819031852.GU1584@vapier> <55D408E4.9000500@tlinx.org>

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 18 Aug 2015 21:41, Linda Walsh wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 18 Aug 2015 13:34, Linda Walsh wrote:
> > (2) it's using the nss system which lets people drop modules into the system
> > at anytime and change the overall lookups to use that.  statically linking a
> > specific subset would block that ability.
> ---
> The linux kernel is a perfect example of a statically linked program that
> can dynamically load plugins to provide authorization data from external
> sources.  Static doesn't mean you can't support 3rd party plugins/libs --
> like LDAP.

which is what the current glibc code already does and why you get a warning
when you link things staticlly.  i'm not sure how you can argue both sides
of the fence on this.
-mike

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: remaking bash, trying static, glibc refuses static...? Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> - 2015-08-19 10:58 -0400

csiph-web