Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #11391

Re: remaking bash, trying static, glibc refuses static...?

Path csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: remaking bash, trying static, glibc refuses static...?
Date Tue, 18 Aug 2015 23:18:52 -0400
Lines 57
Approved bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID <mailman.8607.1439954344.904.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <55D106B2.9000705@tlinx.org> <20150817044932.GB1584@vapier> <55D396EF.8030102@tlinx.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RvrrZ8vH9xW05bsQ"
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1439954344 5056 208.118.235.17 (19 Aug 2015 03:19:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
To bug-bash@gnu.org
Envelope-to bug-bash@gnu.org
Mail-Followup-To bug-bash@gnu.org
Content-Disposition inline
In-Reply-To <55D396EF.8030102@tlinx.org>
X-detected-operating-system by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From 140.211.166.183
X-BeenThere bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.14
Precedence list
List-Id Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash>
List-Post <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:11391

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 18 Aug 2015 13:34, Linda Walsh wrote:
> Then can you give any technical reason why a static
> lib that uses no network services (i.e. running
> on a mini-root ) couldn't be made available for
> the various calls that currently claim "dynamic library
> support" is necessary.

(1) http://www.akkadia.org/drepper/no_static_linking.html
(2) it's using the nss system which lets people drop modules into the system
at anytime and change the overall lookups to use that.  statically linking a
specific subset would block that ability.  which means people using providers
like ldap would be stuck with static binaries that don't work.
https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Name-Service-Switch.html

i'm not going to debate the relevance of such a system nowadays as i don't
care.  purely pointing out that it's not a "political" issue (nor have you
provided any references to back up your specious claim).

> Seems simple enough to provide such a widely asked for 
> feature -- even if it has to be less functional/flexible
> than the dynamic version (i.e. Gnu would have done the best
> they could under the circumstances). 

it's already been provided.  build glibc w/--enable-static-nss.
-mike

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: remaking bash, trying static, glibc refuses static...? Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> - 2015-08-18 23:18 -0400

csiph-web