Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #16206
| Path | csiph.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> |
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] Implement rehashing for associative arrays (Re: speeding up hash_search?) |
| Date | Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:50:25 -0400 |
| Lines | 26 |
| Approved | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| Message-ID | <mailman.841.1587419444.3066.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <CALv3B7aiTbhpyUL17Eg5prH39EgMP8uSDdD554OdND3LFETAQg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFLRLk8ydO6ev8wRcJ35kzzN3Yt2_9sjsc6L+C0CC6dCxud_NA@mail.gmail.com> <CALv3B7bzh3degKPCe5c_avUc90L+bE8jqKKcaVo13zwqEyB5-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAFLRLk-XAU3rrRHy1wWdY7Py-gkLaU-UfiPc47MOEA8eutYx1A@mail.gmail.com> <20200420124911.GW845@eeg.ccf.org> <a351bc16-182b-b2e9-319d-e9d1615f209a@case.edu> <CAFLRLk_KetD6+-o2HOdP6ueKuynu_7Yn6ARZ_HbC4QC=99-WcA@mail.gmail.com> <CALv3B7YTnS8R8D=dYbbOUFROOvhSQ1gfc_ETT+cikp3onBMR1A@mail.gmail.com> <61c51c64-d17e-6ea0-6ace-0c3365ef2299@case.edu> <CALv3B7Yrg7bDO0eViSTBWad56vw_dGnnXtMRa9ofYysiAiYJbA@mail.gmail.com> <20200420215025.GZ845@eeg.ccf.org> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | lists.gnu.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| X-Trace | usenet.stanford.edu 1587419444 18057 209.51.188.17 (20 Apr 2020 21:50:44 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | action@cs.stanford.edu |
| To | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| Envelope-to | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| Mail-Followup-To | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| In-Reply-To | <CALv3B7Yrg7bDO0eViSTBWad56vw_dGnnXtMRa9ofYysiAiYJbA@mail.gmail.com> |
| User-Agent | Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
| Received-SPF | none client-ip=139.137.100.1; envelope-from=wooledg@eeg.ccf.org; helo=mail.eeg.ccf.org |
| X-detected-operating-system | by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/04/20 17:50:26 |
| X-ACL-Warn | Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] |
| X-Received-From | 139.137.100.1 |
| X-BeenThere | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.23 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash> |
| List-Post | <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> |
| X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID | <20200420215025.GZ845@eeg.ccf.org> |
| X-Mailman-Original-References | <CALv3B7aiTbhpyUL17Eg5prH39EgMP8uSDdD554OdND3LFETAQg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFLRLk8ydO6ev8wRcJ35kzzN3Yt2_9sjsc6L+C0CC6dCxud_NA@mail.gmail.com> <CALv3B7bzh3degKPCe5c_avUc90L+bE8jqKKcaVo13zwqEyB5-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAFLRLk-XAU3rrRHy1wWdY7Py-gkLaU-UfiPc47MOEA8eutYx1A@mail.gmail.com> <20200420124911.GW845@eeg.ccf.org> <a351bc16-182b-b2e9-319d-e9d1615f209a@case.edu> <CAFLRLk_KetD6+-o2HOdP6ueKuynu_7Yn6ARZ_HbC4QC=99-WcA@mail.gmail.com> <CALv3B7YTnS8R8D=dYbbOUFROOvhSQ1gfc_ETT+cikp3onBMR1A@mail.gmail.com> <61c51c64-d17e-6ea0-6ace-0c3365ef2299@case.edu> <CALv3B7Yrg7bDO0eViSTBWad56vw_dGnnXtMRa9ofYysiAiYJbA@mail.gmail.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:16206 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 05:12:28PM -0400, George Jones wrote: > No real opinion on syntax. > > Using something existing: > > declare -A foo[SIZE] > > seems sensible, especially if there was no semantic meaning (I'm not a fan > of syntax without semantics .... clutter). That's pretty C-like, and I don't have any strong dislike of it, but I feel I should point out that users will need to quote the final argument if it contains square brackets, just like with unset 'a[i]'. Another choice would be a more shell-like syntax: declare -s size -A foo=(...) I'm curious whether the size has to be specified up front when the array is declared, or can be adjusted on the fly. The shell-like syntax feels more natural if the size is being adjusted, since you can write declare -s new_size foo without needing to specify the -A again. But it's not a huge difference.
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: [PATCH] Implement rehashing for associative arrays (Re: speeding up hash_search?) Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-04-20 17:50 -0400
csiph-web